August 30, 2008, 08:00:49 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

There are currently 0" users in chat
News: Would you like to chat with other users? If so feel free to join the chat room - it doesn't get used very often but if you would like to take advantage of it then please do so.
 
 
  Website   Home   Help Search Affiliate Chat Calendar Members Tags Links Gallery Media Center Login Register  
Gł Solutions Network
In short, the goal of Gł Solutions is in the title. We attempt to define technology in easily understood terms.
From the end-user to the entrenched and battle scarred professional - we all have questions. And answers.
We attempt to answer these questions - in a round-about fashion - as this: "How can technology help?"
MAIN SITE BLOG Main Site Search HOSTING PRIVACY CONTACT ABOUT



Digg This!
Subject Statistics
Topic: Google Image Search gets a face lift Replies: 6 posts
Read 1019 times 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Send this topic  |  Print  
This topic has not yet been rated!
You have not rated this topic. Select a rating:
Author Topic: Google Image Search gets a face lift  (Read 1019 times)
 
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
squeeks
Moderator
Full Member
*****

Karma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Mood:

Posts: 27


 

Topic starter

View Profile
« on: January 31, 2007, 05:15:32 PM »

At first when I saw the new display for Google's Image Search I liked it and thought "Yes, Yes - can't wait till I got the time to dissect it and see what method was used" - note: I have found that 'dissecting' pages or sites that I like to be one of the best ways to learn web dev - not copy, but inspect...

Then when I did have time I discovered a few disappointing things...
- no longer can I see at a glance the details for each image as I scroll
- the effect is accomplished via javascript, not CSS (nothing to learn for me)

Don't get me wrong, I love javascript - but not the wisest thing to achieve effects that could be accomplished with CSS (see Topic: the bleeding CSS) AND for sure the behavior of Google Images' face lift is right up CSS' alley...

Basically, I'd say the first gripe I listed ('no longer can I see at a glance the details for each image as I scroll') is the one that really gets me -- I feel it's pretty bad design wise - making a user "work" harder for the info they seek - that's the one that'll get me --- perhaps I'll disable javascript for them Google pages........
« Last Edit: January 31, 2007, 05:23:59 PM by squeeks » Report to moderator   Logged
Gł Solutions - Technology Defined
« on: January 31, 2007, 05:15:32 PM »
Reply with quoteQuote


 Logged
femlow
Extreme Poster
*******

Karma: +3/-1
Offline Offline

Mood:

OS: XP Home
CPU: 1.56 GHz
RAM: 1 GB
HDD: 80 GB
Posts: 576


Cancer  


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2007, 05:27:00 PM »

I'm not that fond of it either... Not necessarily for those particular reasons, as I really haven't thought that long or hard about it. Mostly I just find it kind of annoying that they had to go and make it flashier with no real benefit that I have noticed...
Report to moderator   Logged
KGIII
Official Code Wrecker
Administrator
Dedicated Poster
********

Karma: +15/-2
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Male
OS: Vista, XP, Ubuntu
CPU: 2x AMD64 4800+
RAM: 3 GB
HDD: 500 GB (Raid0)
Posts: 11279


 

Yes, yes I can.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2007, 06:24:45 PM »

Oddly this is one of the times I think that Google's been hijacking MSN.
Report to moderator   Logged
squeeks
Moderator
Full Member
*****

Karma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Mood:

Posts: 27


 

Topic starter

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2007, 12:43:49 AM »

hey Smiley

looks like google must have gotten too many complaints --- they've reverted their image search to the way it use to be...

anyone know when this revert happened?

Cheesy
Report to moderator   Logged
KGIII
Official Code Wrecker
Administrator
Dedicated Poster
********

Karma: +15/-2
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Male
OS: Vista, XP, Ubuntu
CPU: 2x AMD64 4800+
RAM: 3 GB
HDD: 500 GB (Raid0)
Posts: 11279


 

Yes, yes I can.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2007, 03:36:03 AM »

I don't believe MSN has changed. LOL When you are a narrowband user that can be darned annoying.
Report to moderator   Logged
Gł Solutions - Technology Defined
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2007, 03:36:03 AM »
Reply with quoteQuote


 Logged
squeeks
Moderator
Full Member
*****

Karma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Mood:

Posts: 27


 

Topic starter

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2007, 08:59:07 PM »

thankfully google's returned the simpler more direct display of image search results --- perhaps if we knew someone that had a bit of recognition from Microsoft Wink we could talk them into asking Microsoft to simplify MSN's image search (hehe) --- but yeah - sheesh - MSN's image search > so fancy, so pretty, so neato - sheesh > you know its search functionality doesn't even work if you disable your browser's script....
Report to moderator   Logged
KGIII
Official Code Wrecker
Administrator
Dedicated Poster
********

Karma: +15/-2
Offline Offline

Mood:

Gender: Male
OS: Vista, XP, Ubuntu
CPU: 2x AMD64 4800+
RAM: 3 GB
HDD: 500 GB (Raid0)
Posts: 11279


 

Yes, yes I can.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2007, 02:32:41 PM »

To go back to the top of this post, things done in CSS are limited in that they are suggestions. If functionality is important then scripting should probably be used I suppose. Though it is reaching the point where finding people without JavaScript capabilities enabled is actually fairly easy to do. (e.g. The Sun vs. Microsoft lawsuit of yore that took effect completely a couple of years ago.)
Report to moderator   Logged
Tags:
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

+ Quick Reply
With a Quick-Reply you can use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post, but much more conveniently.

Reminder:
Why not introduce yourself or register?
Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC | Sitemap
This page was magically conjured in about 0.112 seconds with 41 spell components. No animals were harmed in the making of this page.

Google visited last this page August 20, 2008, 05:30:46 PM